Twenty different diagnostic ratios were tested and calculated based on peak heights of the selected biomarker compounds in MC-252 oil. Peak heights were used since they tend to be more robust than area responses for poorly resolved peaks and noisy baselines ( Hansen et al., 2007). The
Metformin cell line diagnostic ratios were calculated by dividing peak height “A” by peak height “B” within an ion group. In addition to diagnostic ratios calculated as A/B, some were calculated by using the sums of peak heights within the ion group (e.g., A/(A + B)). All ratio calculations were done using a corrected baseline value and peak heights not exceeding three times the noise signal were not integrated. The final suite of diagnostic ratios was determined by averaging (n = 32) each diagnostic ratio calculated from separate analyses of MC-252 source oil extract, including the three MC-252 quality control samples analyzed with each sediment sample extract batch. Following Hansen et al.’s (2007) recommendation, diagnostic ratios with a relative standard deviation (RSD = 100 * standard deviation/average) that
exceeded 5% were excluded. Of the twenty ratios tested, 15 diagnostic ratios, given in Table 2, were below this fixed %RSD. These 15 ratios were then used to calculate the repeatability limit, r, at a 95% probability Linsitinib price level (e.g., α = 0.05) and expected normal distribution variance. The repeatability limit was used to determine the absolute and critical difference between the source oil diagnostic ratio and sediment sample
diagnostic ratio. learn more If the absolute difference was greater than the critical difference for a particular diagnostic ratio, it was considered a non-match to the source oil ratio. After applying the repeatability limit, a final score for each sediment sample was calculated based on the number of matching diagnostic ratios per sample (e.g., # of matching sample ratios/15 total MC-252 ratios * 100%). The final score was then used to separate each sample into one of four categories: 93–100% = match; 80–92% = probable match; 50–79% = inconclusive; and <50% = non-match. Peak height integrations and signal-to-noise ratios were double checked for all samples, particularly those in the inconclusive and non-match categories. Final sample scores and classifications are given in Table 3. Two supplemental ratios based on area responses of the C2 and C3 alkyl dibenzothiophenes (DBTs) and phenanthrenes (Phens), C2-DBTs/C2-Phens and C3-DBTs/C3-Phens, were applied as a secondary fingerprinting measure for samples falling into the probable match and inconclusive categories. The C2 and C3 alkyl homolog ratios provide evidence of MC-252 oil in addition to the biomarker ratios for source identification of Louisiana Sweet Crude oils and have been extensively used as source specific markers of oil in sediments (Overton et al., 1981 and Wang et al., 1994).
No related posts.