The interpretation, PD0325901 analysis and views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of NICE. “
groups. Substantial numbers of eligible people did not participate in the interventions, however those who are eligible but do not volunteer, or who volunteer but do not provide data may be different from those who participate. Trial participants
are less likely to be male, current smokers or within the lowest quartile of SES than non-participants or defaulters (Chinn et al., 2006 and Waters et al., 2011). Thus, our quantitative review findings may not necessarily be representative of the hardest-to-reach low-SES groups. Some of the methodological challenges in conducting mixed method reviews would also apply here, including conflicting data produced by different methods, the resource-intensive nature of this method and dependence on authors’ descriptions of interventions (Harden and Thomas, 2007 and Kavanagh et al., 2012). Contextual or cultural differences between data sources may also be a challenge (Campbell et al., 2011). A strength of this review was the inclusion of many types of evidence, which allowed us to explore effectiveness findings in contextual detail and create explicit
links between quantitative and qualitative evidence, using methods appropriate for the data (Harden and Thomas, 2007 and Kavanagh et al., 2012). This enabled us to identify gaps in the intervention evidence base and thus directions for future research (Harden old and Thomas, 2007). There remains limited evidence for buy BAY 73-4506 the effectiveness of specific dietary and physical activity interventions implemented in low-SES communities and many specific barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change exist, which warrant consideration when developing interventions for low-SES populations. While some of these factors appear to have been addressed in the interventions reviewed here, the published evidence
suggests that others have not been addressed to date. Overall, evidence on the effectiveness of community-based dietary and physical activity interventions is inconclusive. A range of barriers and facilitators exist, some of which were addressed by interventions and some of which require consideration in future research. The following are the supplementary data related to this article. Supplementary Table 1. Search strategies and details of evidence sources for community-based dietary and physical activity intervention studies for low-SES groups in the UK, 1990–2009. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Data was collected, analysed and written up by the authors and the funder had no involvement in the analysis, writing up or decision to submit the article for publication. This review was funded by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for the purpose of informing public health development.
No related posts.