Control, CCl4, and CBDL rats increased in body weight between day 0 and day 14, but this was significantly lower only in control rats exposed to CIH compared with HC rats (Table 1). CBDL rats showed a trend either as an absolute or as a percentage increase (P = 0.11). No significant differences in liver weight were observed in control or cirrhotic rats. Control rats
exposed to CIH exhibited a significantly greater hematocrit compared with HC rats (56.7 ± 1.4 versus 51.7 ± 1.3; P ≤ 0.01). There was no significant difference in hematocrit in CIH Selleckchem Copanlisib and HC cirrhotic rats (47.4 ± 1.1 versus 45.4 ± 0.9), although it was significantly lower than in control rats (P < 0.05). After 14 days of CIH protocol, there were no significant differences in MAP (P = 0.9) or heart rate (P = 0.5) measured in CIH and HC control rats, respectively Compound Library (Table 2). MAP was lower in early (P < 0.05) and advanced CCl4 and CBDL (P ≤ 0.01) cirrhotic rats compared with control rats. However, there were no differences between CIH and HC rats within the groups (Table 2). Heart rates were also nonsignificantly different. Baseline values of PP were
similar within the groups, but higher in all cirrhotic rats compared with control rats (Table 2). As expected, sequential volume expansion increased both MAP and PP in the three cirrhotic groups evaluated. However, CIH cirrhotic rats showed a lower MAP increase 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase compared with HC (P = 0.06). Thus, a similar PP increase response was observed in CIH and HC rats
(Fig. 2). As expected, cirrhotic livers showed a higher baseline portal perfusion pressure than control livers (P ≤ 0.01) (Table 2). However, there were no significant differences in baseline perfusion pressure between CIH and HC rats. Control livers exhibited an incremental vasorelaxation in response to cumulative doses of ACh, whereas all cirrhotic rats showed less vasodilation or even paradoxical vasoconstriction (Fig. 3). CIH had no effect on dose-response curves to ACh in control rats (Fig. 3A). However, in livers from rats with advanced CCl4-induced cirrhosis, CIH exposure clearly and significantly attenuated the vasorelaxation in response to cumulative doses of ACh showing higher paradoxical vasoconstriction at the last dose (maximum at 10−5M: 48.7 ± 2.6 versus 23.9 ± 3.4% in HC; P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 3D). However, CIH effects were less patent in CBDL and rats with early cirrhosis in our experimental setting, although a trend was still observed (Fig. 3B,C). Mtx produced a significant, dose-dependent increase in portal perfusion pressure in control and cirrhotic livers (Fig. 4). CIH exposure did not modify the PP response to Mtx in control livers (Fig. 4A). In contrast, this maneuver further exacerbated the effect of Mtx on PP in early (maximum at 10−4M: 12.2 ± 1.5 versus 8.5 ± 1.1 mm Hg in HC; P = 0.08) (Fig. 4C), advanced CCl4 cirrhotic rats (maximum at 5 × 10−5M: 20.8 ± 1.9 versus 15.8 ± 1.
No related posts.