Knowledge of disease prevalence

and participation in clinical trials provides an understanding of recruitment and retention patterns of patients in these trials.”
“Background: Quality of life (QOL) of patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) may be impacted by device technology. Historically, our HPN patients used pole-mounted pumps which can hinder activities find more and affect QOL. Methods: Patients receiving HPN with a pole-mounted pump completed Short Form 36 (SF-36 (R)) and pump-specific questionnaires. Patients were then enrolled in a 2-month prospective crossover open study. Patients were randomized to use a pole-mounted pump or a portable pump. After 1 month, each arm crossed over. Measurements were repeated at 4 and 8 weeks. Results: Participants included 5 males, 15 females; age 52.8 +/- 3.3 (mean +/- SEM) years; 50% had short

bowel syndrome; received HPN for 83.3 +/- 15.9 months; infused HPN over 11.2 +/- 0.3 hours/day; 4.3 +/- 0.4 days/week. Portable pump users scored 53.75 +/- 5.64, 61.25 +/- 6.14, and 40.31 +/- 4.94 in SF-36v2 physical, social, and health vitality, respectively, while the stationary pump users scored 45.50 +/- 4.82, 55.00 +/- 5.97, and 35.31 +/- 4.63, respectively (NS). They reported ease of movement between rooms (4.11 +/- 0.21 vs 1.44 +/- 0.20; Z-VAD-FMK cell line P = .001); when traveling (5.00 +/- 0.00 vs 3.00 +/- 0.45; P < .02) (1 = very difficult, 5 = very easy); 5.0% were sleep disturbed with the portable compared to 42.1% with pole-mounted pump (P < .04). Overall, patients

were significantly happier with the portable vs pole-mounted pump (4.53 +/- 0.19 vs 2.68 +/- 0.22; P < .001) (1 = very unhappy, 5 = very happy). Conclusion: Our HPN selleck screening library patients reported improved happiness and satisfaction regarding ease of use and function with a portable vs pole-mounted pump”
“Campylobacter species belong to the most important foodborne bacteria which cause gastroenteritis in humans in both developed and developing countries. With increasing reporting rates, the public awareness towards Campylobacter infections is growing continuously. This strengthens the necessity to establish intervention measures for prevention and control of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. along the food chain, as in particular poultry and poultry meat represent a major source of human infections. An interdisciplinary One Health approach and a combined effort of all stakeholders are necessary to ultimately reduce the burden of campylobacteriosis cases in humans. Numerous studies point out, however, that at present a complete elimination of Campylobacter in the food chain is not feasible. The present aim should therefore be to establish control measures and intervention strategies to minimize the occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in livestock (e.g.

No related posts.