Most students (95%, 113/119) reported copying from their own previous notes, and 22% (26/119) reported copying from residents. Only 10% (12/119)
indicated that copying from other providers is acceptable, whereas 83% (98/118) believe copying from their own notes is acceptable. Most students use templates and auto-inserted data; 43% (51/120) reported documenting while signed in under an attending’s name. Greater use of documentation efficiency tools is associated with plans to enter a procedural specialty and with lack of awareness of the medical school copy-paste policy. Conclusions: Students frequently use a range of efficiency tools to document in the electronic health record, most commonly copying their own notes. Although the vast majority of students believe it is unacceptable to copy-paste
from other providers, most have observed clinical supervisors doing so.”
“The declining effectiveness of antibiotics Rabusertib order imposes potentially large health and economic burdens on societies. Quantifying the economic outcomes of antibiotic resistance Epigenetics inhibitor effectively can help policy-makers and healthcare professionals to set priorities, but determining the actual effect of antibiotic resistance on clinical outcomes is a necessary first step. In this article, we review and discuss the contributions and limitations of studies that estimate the disease burden attributable to antibiotic resistance and studies that estimate the economic burden of resistance. We also consider other factors that are important in a comprehensive approach to evaluating the economic burden of antibiotic resistance.”
“The aim of this systematic review
is to summarize and critically evaluate the evidence for or against the effectiveness of restraining devices on eye injury in motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). In a PubMed PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor search, the search terms “eye injury and seatbelt,” “eye injury and car belt,” “eye injury and airbag,” and “eye injury and restraining” were used. Among the 30 potentially relevant articles, 5 articles met our inclusion criteria. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were abstracted. The statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager (The Nordic Cochrane Centre). Three studies were subgrouped, and a meta-analysis of these data suggested no significant effects of an airbag on increasing eye injury in MVCs (n = 10,123,954; OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.77-1.56). Two studies were subgrouped, and a meta-analysis of these data suggested that there are beneficial effects of seat belts on decreasing eye injury in MVCs (n = 43,057,271; OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.50-0.51). Seat belts were effective to decrease eye injuries in MVCs. However, airbags had no significant effect on an increase to eye injuries. When using airbags, seat belts should be used together.
No related posts.