The electric induced current on graphene layer resulted in a magnetic field difference, which led to the coupled GSP on graphene layer. Using Maxwell equation and boundary condition, GSP modes were proved to existed for both TE and TM polarization [12, 23–25]. For TE mode, the dispersion relation was as follows: (3) and for TM mode it became (4) Because the imaginary part of conductivity (2) was positive, no solution of Equation 3 was found in real, which meant the TE mode GSP could not be excited. For TM mode, put Equation 2 into Equation 4, we found (5) Here, we defined n eff = β/k 0 = βc/ω as the effective index of GSP. After making a transformation of (ω, n eff) → (ω, β), the

dispersion relations were obtained and plotted in Figure  1. The wave vector was normalized by k Λ0 = 2π/λ 0, λ 0 = 1 μm. check details As a local mode, GSP modes were same as the surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs). They cannot be excited directly from the air. And in our work, gratings were used to provide an external wave vector to match the phase condition. Figure 1 Dispersion relations of graphene surface plasmons (GSPs) on monolayer graphene with different material on two sides. Here, we use the graphene parameters of μ c = 0.2 eV,

τ -1 = 1 meV. Rigorous coupled wave analysis in graphene-containing structures In Figure  2a, we used h to be the depth of selleck products grating (thickness of gratings). The h was also the distance between two graphene layers. In multilayer structures of Figure  2b, 2 h was the longitudinal period. The structures were designed to only contain two kinds of interfaces. Figure 2 Binary grating graphene structures. (a) Torin 2 purchase The bilayer graphene structure. (b) The multilayer graphene structure. h is the grating layer thickness. Λ is the period of grating. L 1 is the width of dielectric Methane monooxygenase with ε 1. L(L 2) is the width of dielectric with ε 2. The duty ratio is f 2 = L/Λ, and f 1 = 1 - f 2.

In this paper, we simply set ε 1 = 1 and ε 2 = 4. In common, the conventional RCWA based on the Floquet’s theorem [26] was unable to be used for the graphene-containing structures as the electric field will induce a current with current density J = σ E, while graphene was included. In RCWA, the field was expanded into the form of (6) So the current density J can also be expended to the sum of spatial harmonics with different wave vector components. To obtain the reflection, transmission, absorption, field distribution, and other optical properties of such structures as shown in Figure  2, a nonzero item must be included in the boundary condition of H y field considering the induced current, (7) According to the principle of superposition, H y will also be continuous at the interface if each spatial harmonics subcomponent satisfied the boundary conditions independently, (8) in which n was the order, ± in subscripts represented approaching to y 0 from two different directions.

No related posts.