The multiplex real-time PCR amplification Tucidinostat datasheet standardization The annealing temperature of the primers (amplification I)
was determined to be 46.0°C and for amplification II – 65.0°C (Table 2). Afterwards, it was arranged that magnesium ion concentration should equal 6.5 mM for amplification I and 11.5 mM for amplification II. Compositions of the reaction mixtures were presented in Table 2. Concentration of the used reagents were as follows: external primers (Genomed) – 10 μM; internal primers (Genomed) – 20 μM; this website TaqMan probes (Genomed) – 20 μM; Buffer B 10× (EURx); dNTP’s (EURx) – 2 mM; MgCl2 (DNAGdansk) – 50 mM; Perpetual Taq Polymerase 2,5 U/μl (EURx). DNA amplification was Neuronal Signaling inhibitor carried out under the following thermal conditions for amplification I: 95°C for 5 min (95°C for 20 s, 46°C for 20 s, 72°C for 30 s) 30 cycles and for amplification II: 95°C for 5 min (95°C for 15 s, 65°C for 1 min) 40 cycles. Table 2 The composition of the reaction mixtures, the reagents involved and PCR reaction thermal profiles NESTED multiplex qPCR Multiplex qPCR [final volume 50 μl] I amplification II amplification [final volume 25 μl] [final volume 10 μl] 1. H2O 6,7 μl 1. H2O 2,08 μl 1. H2O 0,4 μl 2. Buffer B 2,5 μl 2. Buffer
B 1,0 μl 2. Buffer B 5,0 μl 3. EXT_BAC_F 0,125 3. GN/GP_F 0,2 μl 3. GN/GP_F 1,0 μl 4. EXT_BAC_R 0,125 4. GN/GP_R 0,2 μl 4. GN/GP_R 1,0 μl 5. EXT_FUN_F 0,125 5. GP_probe 0,05 μl 5. GP_probe 0,25 μl 6. EXT_FUN_R 0,125 6. GN_probe 0,05 μl 6. GN_probe 0,25 μl 7. dNTP’s 2,5 7. FUN_F 0,2 μl 7. FUN_F 1,0 μl 8. MgCl2 2,5 8. FUN_R 0,2 μl 8. FUN_R 1,0 μl 9. Polymerase Perpetual Taq 0,3 9. Asperg_prob 0,05 μl 9. Asperg_prob 0,25 μl 10. DNA 10 10. Candid_probe 0,05 μl 10. Candid_probe 0,25 μl 11. dNTP’s 1,0 μl 11. dNTP’s 5,0 μl 12. MgCl2 1,8 μl 12. MgCl2 9,0 μl 13. Polymerase Perpetual
Taq 0,12 μl 13. Polymerase Perpetual Taq 0,6 μl 14. DNA (product of I amplification) 3,0 μl 14. DNA 25,0 μl Evaluation of the qPCR method sensitivity The indication of sensitivity was performed CYTH4 separately for amplification II (internal primers) and in the nested system, i.e. in successive amplifications I and II. The obtained results were compared in Table 3. These results allow us to conclude that the use of amplification in the nested system, i.e. successive amplifications I and II, gives us the possibility to increase the detection sensitivity by two orders of magnitude for reference strains of filamentous, yeast fungi and for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in comparison with amplification II alone – functioning as an independent reaction.
No related posts.