These results suggest that drug dilatation
of portal pedicles prior to transplantation increases the efficiency of hepatocyte grafting. (Acta gastroenterol. belg., 2012, 75, 234-239).”
“Background: Most women use medications at some stage in their pregnancy. Medication nonadherence during pregnancy could be detrimental to both mother and fetus.\n\nAims: To study the extent and nature of the use of prescribed medications during pregnancy and factors associated with medication nonadherence.\n\nMethods: All women >= 18 years presenting for their 36th week antenatal visit at the pregnancy clinic of a maternity hospital were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire that contained 61 items, including the Morisky scale. Factors Selleckchem Vorinostat associated with nonadherence were identified in univariate analysis; factors with P < 0.1 were further analysed in a binary logistic regression model.\n\nResults: The participants (n = 819) had a mean age of 30.8 +/- 5.3 years. Most participants were born in Australia, lived with a partner, had university education, were nulliparous, carried one fetus and were nonsmokers. Of these participants, 322 (39.3%) reported a chronic health condition during pregnancy, the most common being asthma (104; 12.7%). Two hundred and seventeen (26.5%) were using prescribed medications, which included anti-anaemics
(68; 8.3%), medicines for chronic airway conditions (64; 7.8%), vitamins and minerals (59; 7.2%) and anti- diabetics (43; 5.2%). Nonadherence was Bcl-2 lymphoma reported by 107 (59.1%) participants, mainly
because of forgetting (79; 43.6%). Factors associated with nonadherence were having asthma (OR 0.26 (95% CI 0.095 – 0.72), P = 0.009) and using nonprescription dietary minerals (0.30 (0.10 – 0.87), P = 0.027).\n\nConclusions: Adherence TEW-7197 to prescribed medicines during pregnancy is alarmingly low. Health professionals should be more proactive in promoting adherence and assisting women avoid potential fetal harm because of nonadherence.”
“Orafi I, Rushton VE. The use of radiography and the apex locator in endodontic treatment within the UK: a comparison between endodontic specialists and general dental practitioners. International Endodontic Journal, 46, 355-364, 2013.\n\nAim To investigate the attitudes of general dental practitioners (GDPs) and specialist endodontists working in the UK in the use of radiography and apex locators during root canal treatment and to see if use was related to respondent’s age and the year of graduation. Methodology A postal questionnaire was sent to 857 randomly selected GDPs and all endodontic specialists working in the UK (170). Non-responders were sent a further two mailings. Chi-squared tests were used to compare both groups at the P<0.05 level of significance. For nonparametric data, the MannWhitney U test was employed. Results The overall response rate was 73%.
No related posts.