A pre-interview (Paterson and Bramadat 1992) was conducted with each patient at their bedside one day prior to their recorded in-depth interview Histone Methyltransferase inhibitor to capture the patient’s interest in and commitment to the research project. During the pre-interview patients were informed of the aims of the research and were told the topic areas (Table 1) that they would be asked about so that they could prepare for the interview. The audio-recorded, in-depth interviews were conducted in a meeting room in the rehabilitation

centre. Experience of physiotherapy rehabilitation was investigated by asking questions in relation to general feelings, likes and dislikes and comments on the amount of physiotherapy they received. An interview schedule (see Table 1) was used as a flexible guide to ensure all topics of interest were covered while allowing patients to tell their own stories in the order that they preferred. Some questions differed depending on whether the patient received Saturday physiotherapy. The same researcher (CP), who was not involved in the patient’s

rehabilitation, conducted all interviews and pre-interviews. All recorded data from the interviews were transcribed VX 770 verbatim. The transcribed interviews and the researchers’ initial interpretation of the emerging themes (eg, physiotherapists were friendly) were then given to the patients to check for accuracy. Member checking helps to ensure that both the transcript and the researchers’ interpretations are an accurate representation of the patient’s experience (Liamputtong 2009). If patients did not agree with the transcripts or interpretation they were given the opportunity to amend them. Once the transcripts were returned to the researchers, all patients were assigned an ID number and transcripts were de-identified to ensure

anonymity. Data collection and data analysis occurred almost simultaneously to help with sampling and refining tentative categories. After member checking Amisulpride of transcripts and initial themes was completed by patients, the transcripts were then read in their entirety by two researchers who examined the data line-by-line and independently assigned codes (eg, personal interactions, motivation, and boredom) to sections of text. The next step was to look at connections and comparisons between codes to develop themes and sub-themes. After codes were assigned and themes were identified independently, the researchers met to discuss these until consensus was reached. If consensus was unable to be reached a third researcher was available to help resolve any discrepancies. The researchers then decided on a main theme and re-read the transcripts to selectively search for data related to the identified themes (selective coding).

No related posts.