The corresponding SAR values #NVP-LDE225 chemical structure randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# of as-synthesized samples could be calculated by the formula [36] (5) where (dT/dt)0 is the initial slope of the T-t curve, C w is the specific heat of water, C FeCo is the specific heat of FeCo nanoparticles, m w is the mass fraction of water in the fluid, and m FeCo is the mass fraction of FeCo nanoparticles in the fluid. The (dT/dt)0 values were calculated by differentiating the second-order polynomial fit of T-t curves at t = 0 where C w and C FeCo are 4,190 J (kg K)-1[36] and 120.11 J (kg K)-1[37]. Figure 9 Inductive properties of FeCo magnetic nanofluids. (a) Temperature rise of magnetic fluid as a function of time under AC magnetic field at various nanoparticle
sizes (f = 120 kHz). (b) Obtained temperature as a function of H c and M s. (c) Matched dependence of SAR and H c on the nanoparticle size. As seen from Figure 9a, the temperature increases with time and saturates after 1,800 s has elapsed, showing a behavior predicted by the Box-Lucas Equation T(t) = A(1 - e-Bt) which is often used for describing the alternating magnetic field properties ubiquitin-Proteasome system of magnetic nanoparticles [36]. It is also seen that the generated heat and specific absorption rate of nanoparticles increase with increasing of the nanoparticle
size such that for the W4 sample with a mean size of 5.5 nm, a temperature rise of 23 K was obtained compared with that of the W3, W2, and W1 samples (11, 4, and 2.5 K) (Table 4). In order to destroy tumor cells, the local temperature should be raised between
5 and 9 K [15]. Thus, at this frequency which is the conventional clinical frequency, only W4 and W3 samples could be used as suitable thermoseeds with corresponding Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase temperature rises of 23 and 11 K. Table 4 Inductive properties of prepared magnetic fluids Sample Mean size (nm) Temp. rise (°C) SAR (W g-1) (experimental) SAR (W g-1) (SW model) SAR (W g-1) (LRT) W1 2 2.5 0.032 – - W2 2.5 4 0.129 – - W3 4 11 0.522 165 ≈0.84 × 10-3 W4 5.5 23 1.434 540 ≈11 × 10-3 Figure 9b indicates a direct relation of temperature rise with H c and M s which means that the generated heat increases by enhancing the hysteresis area, showing an important contribution of hysteresis loss to the generated heat. Also, as observed from Figure 9c, the tendency of SAR to change with particle size is perfectly matched to the tendency of H c values. This is due to the fact that there is a central parameter which determines both the coercivity and maximum achievable SAR and also controls the influence of the size distribution of nanoparticles on the SAR [17]. This parameter is the anisotropy of nanoparticles which has the following optimum value that results in the largest possible SAR for random orientation nanoparticles [17]: (6) Considering H max = 20 (kA m-1), the value of K opt for W4 and W3 samples will be 1.05 × 105 (J m-3) and 5.78 × 104 (J m-3), respectively.
No related posts.